In Graham v. Florida, the Supreme Court held that the Eighth Amendment prohibits a sentence of life without parole ("LWOP") for a juvenile under eighteen who commits a non-homicide offense. For Terrance Graham, who committed home-invasion robbery at seventeen, the decision does not mean necessarily that he someday will leave the brick walls of Florida's Taylor Annex Correctional Institution. Unlike previous Eighth Amendment decisions, such as Roper v. Simmons, where the Court barred the death penalty for juveniles, this new categorical rule does not translate into automatic relief for members of the exempted class: "A State need not guarantee the offender eventual release," Justice Kennedy wrote for the majority, "but if it imposes a sentence of life it must provide him or her with some realistic opportunity to obtain release before the end of that term." Graham offers the possibility of redemption but not its guarantee.
June 2010 FIRST IMPRESSIONS
MOST POPULAR
First Impressions
BY DATE
Monthly Archive
- January 2012 (2)
- December 2011 (1)
- November 2011 (1)
- September 2011 (1)
- August 2011 (1)
- May 2011 (2)
- April 2011 (1)
- March 2011 (2)
TOPICS
Tagged Posts
- Agriculture (8)
- Animals (8)
- Ariel Porat (1)
- Arizona (1)
- Asylum (1)
- Balkin (1)
- Batson v. Kentucky (1)
- Bringewatt (1)
- Bruesewitz v. Wyeth (1)
- Citizens United (1)
- Commerce Clause (2)
- Commercial Speech (1)
- Confrontation Clause (7)
- Congress (1)
- Constitutional Interpretation (2)
- Corporate Governance (3)
- criminal law (1)
- Death Penalty (7)
- DNA (2)
- Domestic Abuse (1)
- Due Care (1)
- Eighth Amendment (1)
- Electoral College (7)
- Environment (8)
- Environmental Policy (7)
- Equal Protection (1)
- Equality (8)
- estate tax (1)
- fifth amendment (1)
- Financial Firms (2)
- First Amendment (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Gender (1)
- Gerrymandering (7)
- Gilo & Guttel (4)
- GINA (1)
- Global Enforcement (1)
- Global Financial Crisis (1)
- Graham v. Florida (2)
- Healthcare (1)
- Human Rights (1)
- Immigration (2)
- Individual Mandate (2)
- Individual Mandate. Universal Health Care (1)
- Insufficient Activity Levels (4)
- Intellectual Property (1)
- Jail (7)
- Joint and Several Liability (1)
- Judicial Review (2)
- Jury Selection (1)
- Juveniles (2)
- Lacey Act (1)
- Local Control (1)
- LWOP (2)
- Manning (1)
- McCain (6)
- Michigan Civil Rights Initiative (5)
- Miranda (1)
- Natural Born Citizenship (6)
- Originalism (1)
- Patent Law (6)
- Pay to Stay (7)
- peremptory challenges (1)
- perpetual trusts (1)
- PPACA (1)
- Preemption (1)
- Probability (1)
- Product Liability (1)
- Proportionality (2)
- Race (1)
- reasonable person test (1)
- Regulatory State (1)
- Religion (1)
- S.B. 1070 (1)
- Same Sex Marriage (1)
- Securities Fraud (1)
- Supreme Court (9)
- tax (1)
- Tebbe & Tsai (1)
- Television (8)
- Terrorism (1)
- Timber (1)
- Tort (1)
- Torts (1)
- Trademark Dilution (4)
- trusts (1)
- Vaccine (1)
- Vaccines (7)
- Women (1)
February 2012 Vol. 110 No. 4
CURRENT FEATURES
& Other Current Events