May 2006 Vol. 104 No. 6 THE REVIEW

Badinter & Breyer: Judges in Contemporary Democracy: An International Conversation

Ronald J. Krotoszynski, Jr.

"I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing (in Perfect Harmony)": International Judicial Dialogue and the Muses—Reflections on the Perils and the Promise of International Judicial Dialogue

Judges in Contemporary Democracy: An International Conversation. Edited by Robert Badinter & Stephen Breyer. New York and London: New York University Press. 2004. Pp. ix, 317. $55.

Proponents of international judicial dialogue would do well to read, and reflect upon, the conversations chronicled in Judges in Contemporary Democracy. In a lucid and candid series of interlocutions, five preeminent constitutional jurists and one highly regarded constitutional theorist ponder some of the most difficult questions about the role of a judge on a constitutional court. In particular, the participants—including Stephen Breyer (Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States), Robert Badinter (former President of the Constitutional Council of France), Antonio Cassese (former President of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia), Dieter Grimm (former Justice of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany), Gil Carlos Rodriguez Iglesias (President, Court of Justice of the European Communities), and Ronald Dworkin (Professor of Law at New York University, Professor of Jurisprudence at University College London, and formerly Professor of Jurisprudence at Oxford University)—consider the countermajoritarian problem identified by Alexander Bickel. In a democratic society, why should judges have the final say when judges lack the democratic mandate enjoyed by executive and legislative branch officials? Why do the other branches of government—to say nothing of average citizens—accept judicial decisions that invalidate legislative or executive actions? The participants posit a creeping “judicialization” of democratic government, in which the political branches call upon judges to undertake broader and broader responsibilities.

   //  VIEW PDF
& Other Current Events

Judicial Diversity After Shelby County v. Holder

In 2014, voters in ten of the fifteen states previously covered by the Voting Rights Act ("VRA") preclearance...

Fall Submission Season

MLR’s Articles Office will open its fall submission season on Monday, August 18!  The Articles...

The Ninth Circuit's Treatment of Sexual Orientation: Defining “Rational Basis Review with Bite”

On February 10, Nevada's Democratic attorney general decided to stop defending the state's constitutional...

Inhibiting Intrastate Inequalities: A Congressional Approach to Ensuring Equal Opportunity to Finance Public Education

The United States has exhibited a strong commitment to public education throughout its history. The local...

War Is Governance: Explaining the Logic of the Laws of War from a Principal-Agent Perspective

What is the purpose of the international law on armed conflict, and why would opponents bent on destroying...
MAILING LIST
Sign Up to Join Our Mailing List