May 2007 Vol. 105 No. 7 THE REVIEW

Correspondence: God vs. the Gavel: A Brief Rejoinder

Douglas Laycock

I recently reviewed God vs. the Gavel by Professor Marci Hamilton, and she published a brief response. My review briefly summarized the book and then made three principal points, addressing Hamilton’s institutional competence thesis, her “no-harm” principle, and the remarkable number of legal and factual errors in the book. In this reply, I will review each of these points in turn.

   //  VIEW PDF
& Other Current Events

Volume 108, No. 7

Issue 7 of MLR volume 108 is now online.

Volume 108, No. 6

Issue 6 of MLR volume 108 is now online.

Volume 108, No. 5

Issue 5 of MLR volume 108 is now online.

Insufficient Activity and Tort Liability: A Rejoinder

In our article, Negligence and Insufficient Activity, we proposed that tort scholarship has overlooked the...

Volume 108, No. 4

Issue 4 of MLR volume 108 is now online. New First Impressions essays will be published soon.
MAILING LIST
Sign Up to Join Our Mailing List