May 2007 Vol. 105 No. 7 THE REVIEW

Correspondence: The Angel is in the Big Picture: A Response to Lemley

Samson Vermont

An invention within close reach of multiple inventors differs from an invention within distant reach of a lone inventor. The differences between these two archetypes of invention—“reinventables” and “singletons”—remain unexploited under current U.S. law. Should we reform the law to exploit the differences? Mark Lemley and I agree that we should. To date, those economists who have closely examined the issue concur.

   //  VIEW PDF
& Other Current Events

Volume 108, No. 7

Issue 7 of MLR volume 108 is now online.

Volume 108, No. 6

Issue 6 of MLR volume 108 is now online.

Volume 108, No. 5

Issue 5 of MLR volume 108 is now online.

Insufficient Activity and Tort Liability: A Rejoinder

In our article, Negligence and Insufficient Activity, we proposed that tort scholarship has overlooked the...

Volume 108, No. 4

Issue 4 of MLR volume 108 is now online. New First Impressions essays will be published soon.
MAILING LIST
Sign Up to Join Our Mailing List