May 2007 Vol. 105 No. 7 THE REVIEW

Doctors & Juries

Phillip G. Peters, Jr.

Physicians widely believe that jury verdicts are unfair. This Article tests that assumption by synthesizing three decades of jury research. Contrary to popular belief, the data show that juries consistently sympathize more with doctors who are sued than with patients who sue them. Physicians win roughly half of the cases that expert reviewers believe physicians should lose and nearly all of the cases that experts feel physicians should win. Defendants and their hired experts, it turns out, are more successful than plaintiffs and their hired experts at persuading juries to reach verdicts contrary to the opinions of independent reviewers.

   //  VIEW PDF
& Other Current Events

Volume 108, No. 7

Issue 7 of MLR volume 108 is now online.

Volume 108, No. 6

Issue 6 of MLR volume 108 is now online.

Volume 108, No. 5

Issue 5 of MLR volume 108 is now online.

Insufficient Activity and Tort Liability: A Rejoinder

In our article, Negligence and Insufficient Activity, we proposed that tort scholarship has overlooked the...

Volume 108, No. 4

Issue 4 of MLR volume 108 is now online. New First Impressions essays will be published soon.
MAILING LIST
Sign Up to Join Our Mailing List