In March 2008, the Supreme Court decided Snyder v. Louisiana, the latest in the line of progeny of Batson v. Kentucky. This Note demonstrates that Snyder is part of a historical pattern of Supreme Court decisions concerning the use of peremptory challenges in which the Court has moved away from permitting the unfettered use of the peremptory challenge in favor of stronger Equal Protection considerations. Snyder alters the requirements for trial judges in deciding Batson challenges by requiring them to provide some explanation of their reasons for accepting a prosecutor's justification of a peremptory challenge. Snyder is the latest step in the historical pattern of trying to create a more enforceable standard to prevent racial discrimination in jury selection and in keeping with this pattern should be broadly interpreted going forward.
May 2010 Vol. 108 No. 7 THE REVIEW
Snyder v. Louisiana: Continuing the Historical Trend Towards Increased Scrutiny of Peremptory Challenges
//
VIEW PDF
PAST ISSUES
of The Review
The Online Companion
CURRENT FEATURES
RESPONSES
& Other Current Events
What's In A Name? A Brief Study of Legal Aptonyms
Law and literature ranges wide. Scholars use Shakespeare to illuminate issues of justice, Dickens to understand...Rethinking Reporter's Privilege
Forty years ago, in Branzburg v. Hayes, the Supreme Court made its first and only inquiry into...Standing's Expected Value
This Article argues in favor of standing based on expected value of harm. Standing doctrine has been...Counsel's Control over the Presentation of Mitigating Evidence During Capital Sentencing
The Sixth Amendment gives a defendant the right to control his defense and the right to a lawyer's...Law-Enforcement Officers and Self-Help Repossession: A State-Action Approach
Repossession of secured collateral is a fundamental component of the consumer credit industry. The...
MAILING LIST
Sign Up to Join Our Mailing List