February 2007 Vol. 105 No. 4 THE REVIEW

Mostly Harmless: An Analysis of Post-AEDPA Federal Habeas Corpus Review of State Harmless Error Determinations

Jeffrey S. Jacobi

Sixty years ago, in Kotteakos v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that a small class of so-called harmless errors committed by courts did not require correction. The Court acknowledged that some judicial errors, though recognizable as errors, did not threaten the validity of criminal convictions and therefore did not require reversal. Specifically, the Court held that errors that violated federal statutes should be deemed harmless unless they had a “substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury’s verdict.” While Kotteakos represented the Supreme Court’s first treatment of the concept of harmlessness, other courts had a history of preserving convictions using harmless error review. For some time before Kotteakos, state statutes had directed appellate courts throughout the country to use harmless error review, a doctrine that prevents appellate courts from disposing of convictions on technicalities, “conserve[s] judicial resources by enabling appellate courts to cleanse the judicial process of prejudicial error without becoming mired in harmless error,” and allows courts to focus on “decid[ing] the factual question of the defendant’s guilt or innocence.”

   //  VIEW PDF
& Other Current Events

How the Gun-Free School Zones Act Saved the Individual Mandate

  For all the drama surrounding the Commerce Clause challenge to the individual mandate provision...

Citing Orin Kerr from MLR Volume 102, the Court addresses the controversy over GPS trackers and the Fourth Amendment

The Supreme Court's opinion in United States v. Jones, on GPS trackers and the Fourth Amendment, cited...

Inside Agency Preemption

A subtle shift has taken place in the mechanics of preemption, the doctrine that determines when federal...

Criminal Sanctions in the Defense of the Innocent

  Under the formal rules of criminal procedure, fact finders are required to apply a uniform standard...

On Strict Liability Crimes: Preserving a Moral Framework for Criminal Intent in an Intent-Free Moral World

The law has long recognized a presumption against criminal strict liability. This Note situates that...
MAILING LIST
Sign Up to Join Our Mailing List