This Article examines the Oregon Death with Dignity Act from a medical perspective. Drawing on case studies and information provided by doctors, families, and other care givers, it finds that seemingly reasonable safeguards for the care and protection of terminally ill patients written into the Oregon law are being circumvented. The problem lies primarily with the Oregon Public Health Division (“OPHD”), which is charged with monitoring the law. OPHD does not collect the information it would need to effectively monitor the law and in its actions and publications acts as the defender of the law rather than as the protector of the welfare of terminally ill patients. We make explicit suggestions for what OPHD would need to do to change that.
June 2008 Vol. 106 No. 8 THE REVIEW
Physician-Assisted Suicide in Oregon: A Medical Perspective
//
VIEW PDF
PAST ISSUES
of The Review
The Online Companion
CURRENT FEATURES
RESPONSES
& Other Current Events
How the Gun-Free School Zones Act Saved the Individual Mandate
For all the drama surrounding the Commerce Clause challenge to the individual mandate provision...Citing Orin Kerr from MLR Volume 102, the Court addresses the controversy over GPS trackers and the Fourth Amendment
The Supreme Court's opinion in United States v. Jones, on GPS trackers and the Fourth Amendment, cited...Inside Agency Preemption
A subtle shift has taken place in the mechanics of preemption, the doctrine that determines when federal...Criminal Sanctions in the Defense of the Innocent
Under the formal rules of criminal procedure, fact finders are required to apply a uniform standard...On Strict Liability Crimes: Preserving a Moral Framework for Criminal Intent in an Intent-Free Moral World
The law has long recognized a presumption against criminal strict liability. This Note situates that...
MAILING LIST
Sign Up to Join Our Mailing List