Many public and private universities around the country employ legacy admissions preferences in order to give children of alumni special consideration in the admissions process. Such preferences disproportionately benefit white applicants at the cost of their nonwhite counterparts, because past generations of college students were less diverse than today's applicant pool. However, universities argue that their legacy preferences are justified because they assist in alumni fundraising efforts. This Note presents a statistical analysis to argue that legacy preferences are prohibited by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 because they have a discriminatory effect on minority college applicants and have not been shown to promote (and do not promote) any legitimate university purpose.
January 2010 Vol. 108 No. 4 THE REVIEW
Preserving a Racial Hierarchy: A Legal Analysis of the Disparate Racial Impact of Legacy Preferences in University Admissions
//
VIEW PDF
PAST ISSUES
of The Review
The Online Companion
CURRENT FEATURES
RESPONSES
& Other Current Events
Insufficient Activity and Tort Liability: A Rejoinder
In our article, Negligence and Insufficient Activity, we proposed that tort scholarship has overlooked the...Volume 108, No. 4
Issue 4 of MLR volume 108 is now online. New First Impressions essays will be published soon.Volume 108, No. 3
Issue 3 of MLR volume 108 is now online. New First Impressions essays have also been added.First Impressions Essay Competition
Open to all Michigan Law students. Winner gets published and $100. Deadline: Jan. 29, 2010 at 5:00 p.m.Volume 108, No. 2
Issue 2 of Volume 108 is now online.
MAILING LIST
Sign Up to Join Our Mailing List