While they often rely on the threat of penalties to produce deterrence, legal systems rarely use the promise of rewards. In this Article, we consider the use of rewards to motivate director vigilance. Measures to enhance director liability are commonly perceived to be too costly. We, however, demonstrate that properly designed reward regimes could match the behavioral incentives offered by negligence-based liability regimes but with significantly lower costs. We further argue that the market itself cannot implement such a regime in the form of equity compensation for directors. We conclude by providing preliminary sketches of two alternative reward regimes. While this Article focuses on outside directors, the implications of our analysis extend to other gatekeepers as well.
PAST ISSUES
of The Review
The Online Companion
CURRENT FEATURES
RESPONSES
& Other Current Events
Writing Competition Panel Audio Recording
On Tuesday, April 4, members of the Michigan Law Review discussed the 2012 writing competition and the...Agency and Equity: Why Do We Blame Clients for Their Lawyers' Mistakes?
If you were to ask a child whether it would be fair to execute a prisoner because his lawyer had made...How United States v. Jones Can Restore Our Faith in the Fourth Amendment
United States v. Jones, issued in January of this year, is a landmark case that has the potential to restore...Who's Bringing the Children?: Expanding the Family Exemption for Child Smuggling Offenses
Under immigration law, an alien smuggling offense takes place when one knowingly encourages, induces,...How the Gun-Free School Zones Act Saved the Individual Mandate
For all the drama surrounding the Commerce Clause challenge to the individual mandate provision...
MAILING LIST
Sign Up to Join Our Mailing List