We are coming upon the twenty-fifth anniversary of the Supreme Court's opinion in Batson v. Kentucky, which made clear that our Constitution does not permit prosecutors to remove prospective jurors from the jury pool because of their race. The legal question in Batson-when, if ever, can governmental race discrimination in jury selection be tolerated?-was easy. The lingering factual question, however-when will prosecutors cease to discriminate on the basis of race?-has proven far more difficult to answer. The evidence that district attorneys still exclude minorities because of their race is so compelling that it is tempting to assume that race will always factor into lawyers' decisions about whom to keep on the jury and whom to exclude. Yet, until the Supreme Court holds lower courts accountable when they fail to meaningfully enforce the protections of Batson, we cannot know if the law goes far enough, and race will continue to permeate jury selections.
FIRST IMPRESSIONS
POSTS TAGGED "Jury Selection"
MOST POPULAR
First Impressions
BY DATE
Monthly Archive
- May 2013 (1)
- April 2013 (3)
- February 2013 (1)
- January 2013 (1)
- October 2012 (1)
- September 2012 (2)
- July 2012 (1)
- June 2012 (1)
TOPICS
Tagged Posts
- Agriculture (8)
- Animals (8)
- Ariel Porat (1)
- Arizona (1)
- Asylum (1)
- Balkin (1)
- Batson v. Kentucky (1)
- Bringewatt (1)
- Bruesewitz v. Wyeth (1)
- Citizens United (1)
- Commerce Clause (2)
- Commercial Speech (1)
- Confrontation Clause (7)
- Congress (1)
- Constitutional Interpretation (2)
- Corporate Governance (3)
- criminal law (1)
- Death Penalty (7)
- DNA (2)
- Domestic Abuse (1)
- Due Care (1)
- Eighth Amendment (1)
- Electoral College (7)
- Environment (8)
- Environmental Policy (7)
- Equal Protection (1)
- Equality (8)
- estate tax (1)
- fifth amendment (1)
- Financial Firms (2)
- First Amendment (1)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1)
- Gender (1)
- Gerrymandering (7)
- Gilo & Guttel (4)
- GINA (1)
- Global Enforcement (1)
- Global Financial Crisis (1)
- Graham v. Florida (2)
- Healthcare (1)
- Human Rights (1)
- Immigration (2)
- Individual Mandate (2)
- Individual Mandate. Universal Health Care (1)
- Insufficient Activity Levels (4)
- Intellectual Property (1)
- Jail (7)
- Joint and Several Liability (1)
- Judicial Review (2)
- Jury Selection (1)
- Juveniles (2)
- Lacey Act (1)
- Local Control (1)
- LWOP (2)
- Manning (1)
- McCain (6)
- Michigan Civil Rights Initiative (5)
- Miranda (1)
- Natural Born Citizenship (6)
- Originalism (1)
- Patent Law (6)
- Pay to Stay (7)
- peremptory challenges (1)
- perpetual trusts (1)
- PPACA (1)
- Preemption (1)
- Probability (1)
- Product Liability (1)
- Proportionality (2)
- Race (1)
- reasonable person test (1)
- Regulatory State (1)
- Religion (1)
- S.B. 1070 (1)
- Same Sex Marriage (1)
- Securities Fraud (1)
- Supreme Court (9)
- tax (1)
- Tebbe & Tsai (1)
- Television (8)
- Terrorism (1)
- Timber (1)
- Tort (1)
- Torts (1)
- Trademark Dilution (4)
- trusts (1)
- Vaccine (1)
- Vaccines (7)
- Women (1)
May 2013 Vol. 111 No. 7
& Other Current Events