June 2006 Vol. 104 No. 7 THE REVIEW

The Executive Role in Culturing Export Control Compliance

Matthew G. Morris

The control of exports in order to protect national interests is subject to a “frightful labyrinth” of laws and regulations. The motive for enacting these laws varies: some are enacted to satisfy United States treaty obligations, some for national security reasons, and others for humanitarian considerations. Further complicating matters, these laws issue from multiple sources. At times, the enabling legislation has lapsed only to be cobbled back together by interim legislation or by Executive Order. The result is a legal regime where “it can be difficult to find and piece together applicable law.”

   //  VIEW PDF
& Other Current Events

Writing Competition Panel Audio Recording

On Tuesday, April 4, members of the Michigan Law Review discussed the 2012 writing competition and the...

Agency and Equity: Why Do We Blame Clients for Their Lawyers' Mistakes?

If you were to ask a child whether it would be fair to execute a prisoner because his lawyer had made...

How United States v. Jones Can Restore Our Faith in the Fourth Amendment

United States v. Jones, issued in January of this year, is a landmark case that has the potential to restore...

Who's Bringing the Children?: Expanding the Family Exemption for Child Smuggling Offenses

Under immigration law, an alien smuggling offense takes place when one knowingly encourages, induces,...

How the Gun-Free School Zones Act Saved the Individual Mandate

  For all the drama surrounding the Commerce Clause challenge to the individual mandate provision...
MAILING LIST
Sign Up to Join Our Mailing List