June 2006 Vol. 104 No. 7 THE REVIEW

The Executive Role in Culturing Export Control Compliance

Matthew G. Morris

The control of exports in order to protect national interests is subject to a “frightful labyrinth” of laws and regulations. The motive for enacting these laws varies: some are enacted to satisfy United States treaty obligations, some for national security reasons, and others for humanitarian considerations. Further complicating matters, these laws issue from multiple sources. At times, the enabling legislation has lapsed only to be cobbled back together by interim legislation or by Executive Order. The result is a legal regime where “it can be difficult to find and piece together applicable law.”

   //  VIEW PDF
& Other Current Events

Crawford v. Washington: A Ten Year Retrospective

No one disputes the significance of Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), which fundamentally transformed Confrontation...

Come Back to the Boat, Justice Breyer!

I want to get Justice Breyer back on the right side of Confrontation Clause issues. In 1999, in Lilly...

Crawford v. Washington: The Next Ten Years

Imagine a world . . . in which the Supreme Court got it right the first time. That is,...

The Crawford Debacle

First a toast-to my colleague Jeff Fisher and his Crawford compatriot, Richard Friedman, on the...

Confrontation and the Re-Privatization of Domestic Violence

When the Supreme Court transformed the right of confrontation in Crawford v. Washington, the prosecution...
MAILING LIST
Sign Up to Join Our Mailing List